Mark O. Freeman

416 citations
22 papers · 301 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mark O. Freeman

22 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

Mark O. Freeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Media Technology 138
  • Human-Computer Interaction 55
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 8
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 73
  • Instrumentation 11
Replace Edward Buckley with:
Edward Buckley United Kingdom
Qichao Hou China
Vladimir Saveljev South Korea
Chenggao Luo China
Cheng Yao China
Nathan Matsuda United States
Malcolm McCormick United Kingdom
Neil A. Davies United Kingdom
Zhengbo Zhu China
Jonathan Harrold United Kingdom
Mark O. Freeman relative to Edward Buckley United Kingdom Edward Buckley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Edward Buckley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark O. Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark O. Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark O. Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark O. Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark O. Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark O. Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark O. Freeman. The network helps show where Mark O. Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Mark O. Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark O. Freeman Line = papers co-authored together Mark O. Freeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200958
2 199241
3 201340
4 201323
5 201121
6 201219
7 200313
8 199912
9 199312
10 198811
11 201211
12 19879
13 19925
14 19994
15 19984
16 19914
17 19913
18 19933
19 20023
20 20002

About Mark O. Freeman

Mark O. Freeman is a scholar working on Media Technology, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 301 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (10 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (6 papers), Advanced optical system design (5 papers), Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry (4 papers), Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements (3 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (3 papers), Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (3 papers) and Interactive and Immersive Displays (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (138 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (55 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (8 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (73 citations) and Instrumentation (11 citations). Mark O. Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Hakan Ürey, M. Champion, Tyler Brown, David M. Walba, Bahaa E. A. Saleh, Kaan Akşit, Yuan‐Chin Lee, John L. Lewis and Ming‐Wen Chang. Their work appears in journals such as Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Optics and Photonics News, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics and Optics Express.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact