Mark Moore
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Family and Disability Support Research
- Applied Psychology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life 1
-
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 1
- Co-authors
- Martin D. Murphy (1 shared paper)Patrick M. O’Neil (1 shared paper)Jeffrey J. Borckardt (1 shared paper)Michael R. Nash (1 shared paper)Darlene Shaw (1 shared paper)Anthony F. Tasso (1 shared paper)Elizabeth Harvey (1 shared paper)Shannon R. Poppito (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Psycho-Oncology (1 paper)American Psychologist (1 paper)The American Journal of Psychoanalysis (1 paper)Oxford University Press eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark Moore
3 papers receiving 308 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Clinical Psychology 176
- Applied Psychology 42
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 74
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 49
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 5
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Moore
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Moore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Moore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Moore. The network helps show where Mark Moore may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Mark Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 294 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 0 |
About Mark Moore
Mark Moore is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Oncology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 4 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (1 paper), Psychological Testing and Assessment (1 paper), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (1 paper), Cancer survivorship and care (1 paper), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (1 paper) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (176 citations), Applied Psychology (42 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (74 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (49 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (5 citations). Mark Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Martin D. Murphy, Patrick M. O’Neil, Jeffrey J. Borckardt, Michael R. Nash, Darlene Shaw, Anthony F. Tasso, Elizabeth Harvey, Shannon R. Poppito, Anne Martin and Jimmie C. Holland. Their work appears in journals such as Psycho-Oncology, American Psychologist, The American Journal of Psychoanalysis and Oxford University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.