Mark McLelland

1.5k citations
57 papers · 625 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Mark McLelland

51 papers receiving 500 citations

Peers

Mark McLelland
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Cultural Studies 272
  • Gender Studies 203
  • Sociology and Political Science 342
  • Social Psychology 148
  • Communication 33
Replace C. Riley Snorton with:
C. Riley Snorton United States
Heather Love United States
Madeline Davis United States
Paisley Currah United States
E. Patrick Johnson France
Sarah Thornton Australia
Jodie Taylor Australia
Paul Spickard United States
Julian Gill-Peterson United States
Esther Newton United States
Mark McLelland relative to C. Riley Snorton United States C. Riley Snorton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
C. Riley Snorton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark McLelland

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark McLelland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark McLelland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark McLelland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark McLelland

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark McLelland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark McLelland. The network helps show where Mark McLelland may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Mark McLelland, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark McLelland Line = papers co-authored together Mark McLelland links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
AsiaPacifiQueer: Rethinking Genders and Sexualities
200877
2 201469
3 200258
4 200039
5 200235
6 200533
7 200023
8 200019
9 200718
10 201117
11 200917
12 200817
13 201616
14 200514
15 201213
16 200412
17 201011
18
Why are Japanese girls' comics full of boys bonking?
200611
19 20099
20 20029

About Mark McLelland

Mark McLelland is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 625 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (34 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (30 papers), Digital Games and Media (7 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (6 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (5 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (5 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (4 papers) and Sex work and related issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (272 citations), Gender Studies (203 citations), Sociology and Political Science (342 citations), Social Psychology (148 citations) and Communication (33 citations). Mark McLelland has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Vera Mackie, Audrey Yue, Fran Martin, Peter A. Jackson, Seunghyun Yoo, Gerard Goggin, Pamela Jackson and James Welker. Their work appears in journals such as Sexualities, Continuum, International Journal of Cultural Studies, Media International Australia and Journal of Bisexuality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact