Mark M. Smith

190 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Mark M. Smith's Hit Papers

Emotion, Sense, Experience 2020 · 68 citations
680+2+4Years since publication204060

Peers

Mark M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
  • Music 141
  • Oral Surgery 223
  • Small Animals 193
  • Equine 34
  • History and Philosophy of Science 80
Replace Ian Gordon with:
Ian Gordon Australia
John Richardson United Kingdom
Michael Sorkin United States
David A. Gerber United States
William J. Richardson United States
Mike W. Martin United States
William P. Coleman United States
David Walker United Kingdom
John C. Greene United States
Edward Peters United States
Mark M. Smith relative to Ian Gordon Australia Ian Gordon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×
Ian Gordon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark M. Smith. The network helps show where Mark M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark M. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark M. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Mark M. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 208 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Sensing the past : seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, and touching in history
2007167
2 200296
3 200293
4
Religion in Industrial Society: Oldham and Saddleworth, 1740-1865
199471
5
Emotion, Sense, Experience
Hit paper breakdown →
202068
6 200958
7 200752
8 198648
9 200947
10 201444
11 202241
12 199837
13 199535
14 200234
15 201332
16 200332
17 202131
18 200231
19 200730
20 200829

About Mark M. Smith

Mark M. Smith is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oral Surgery, Molecular Biology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 208 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Oncology Research (22 papers), Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (21 papers), dental development and anomalies (20 papers), Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments (11 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (11 papers), Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (9 papers), Race, History, and American Society (8 papers) and Bone fractures and treatments (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (141 citations), Oral Surgery (223 citations), Small Animals (193 citations), Equine (34 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (80 citations). Mark M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Rob Boddice, Susan L. Cutter, John L. Robertson, William J. Mauermann, Maria A. Fahie, Terence C. Amis, C. Kurpershoek, David W. Barbara, Gregory A. Nuttall and Bradford B. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Journal of American History and Anesthesia & Analgesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact