Mark Langley

27 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Mark Langley
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 218
  • Developmental Neuroscience 52
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 186
  • Nephrology 80
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 47
Replace Karen J. McClellan with:
Karen J. McClellan New Zealand
M. Bredgaard Sørensen Denmark
Lars O. Boréus Sweden
Gordon L. Kauffman United States
Michelle I. Wilde New Zealand
D. B. Frewin Australia
M. J. WATSON United Kingdom
Lester F. Soyka United States
Gopal Krishna United States
Shung-Tai Ho Taiwan
Mark Langley relative to Karen J. McClellan New Zealand Karen J. McClellan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Karen J. McClellan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Langley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Langley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Langley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Langley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Langley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Langley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Langley. The network helps show where Mark Langley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Langley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Langley Line = papers co-authored together Mark Langley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988247
2 1989181
3 1993116
4 198497
5 198890
6 198588
7 198561
8 198847
9 199445
10 198540
11 199736
12 200735
13 199734
14 198831
15 198630
16 199624
17 201922
18 199721
19 199020
20 200818

About Mark Langley

Mark Langley is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (7 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (5 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (5 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (4 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (3 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (2 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (218 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (52 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (186 citations), Nephrology (80 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (47 citations). Mark Langley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include R.C. Heel, Eugene M. Sorkin, Geoffrey L. Hammond, Philip A. Robinson, Paul S. Myles, Anthony M. Weeks, Stephen P. Clissold, Emmanuel Saltiel, J. Paul Monk and A. Gray Ellrodt. Their work appears in journals such as Drugs, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, ASAIO Journal, Anesthesia & Analgesia and Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact