Mark Knight
Impact in
- Archeology top 10%
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Paleopathology and ancient diseases
- Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
- Paleontology top 10%
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Papers in
-
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies 5
-
- Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology 3
- Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Duncan Garrow (2 shared papers)Helen L. Whelton (1 shared paper)Steve Boreham (1 shared paper)G. D. B. Jones (1 shared paper)Piers D. Mitchell (1 shared paper)Ian D. Bull (1 shared paper)Chris Evans (1 shared paper)John G. Evans (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Parasitology (1 paper)Antiquity (1 paper)Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society (4 papers)Apollo (University of Cambridge) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSri LankaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark Knight
8 papers receiving 89 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Archeology 10
- Paleontology 61
- Space and Planetary Science 10
- Anthropology 43
- Archeology 41
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Knight
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Knight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Knight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Knight more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Knight
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Knight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Knight. The network helps show where Mark Knight may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Mark Knight, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 36 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 11 | |
| 6 | Must Farm: an extraordinary tale of the everyday | 2016 | 4 |
| 7 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 2 |
About Mark Knight
Mark Knight is a scholar working on Paleontology, Anthropology, Archeology, Archeology and Space and Planetary Science, having authored 8 papers that have together received 103 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (5 papers), Archaeology and Rock Art Studies (3 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (3 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (2 papers), Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (1 paper), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (1 paper), Archaeological Research and Protection (1 paper) and Paleopathology and ancient diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (10 citations), Paleontology (61 citations), Space and Planetary Science (10 citations), Anthropology (43 citations) and Archeology (41 citations). Mark Knight has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sri Lanka and United States. Frequent co-authors include Duncan Garrow, Helen L. Whelton, Steve Boreham, G. D. B. Jones, Piers D. Mitchell, Ian D. Bull, Chris Evans, John G. Evans, Madison Fairey and Frances Healy. Their work appears in journals such as Parasitology, Antiquity, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society and Apollo (University of Cambridge).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.