Mark Kim

31 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Mark Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 56
  • Information Systems and Management 69
  • Hardware and Architecture 50
  • Information Systems 97
  • Polymers and Plastics 47
Replace Amitabh Chaudhary with:
Amitabh Chaudhary United States
Bing Xie China
Marcelo Veiga Neves Brazil
Karan Bhatia United States
Ilia Pietri United Kingdom
Elif Dede United States
Sung-Bong Yang South Korea
Tianhai Zhao China
Zhiyu Lin China
Timothy Mann United States
Mark Kim relative to Amitabh Chaudhary United States Amitabh Chaudhary's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15.3×
Amitabh Chaudhary · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Kim. The network helps show where Mark Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Kim Line = papers co-authored together Mark Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018118
2 202057
3 201927
4 201825
5 202117
6 202016
7 202115
8 20189
9
Extending the Publish/Subscribe Abstraction for High-Performance I/O and Data Management at Extreme Scale.
20209
10 20188
11 20167
12 20187
13 20176
14 20186
15 20206
16 20164
17 20204
18 20183
19 20193
20
Assembling large mosaics of electron microscope images using GPU
20112

About Mark Kim

Mark Kim is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Information Systems and Management, Hardware and Architecture, Computer Networks and Communications and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 33 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (11 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (8 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (4 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (4 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (4 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (4 papers), Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (3 papers) and Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (56 citations), Information Systems and Management (69 citations), Hardware and Architecture (50 citations), Information Systems (97 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (47 citations). Mark Kim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Brian N. Hilton, Yong Min Kim, Hong Chul Moon, David Pugmire, Hank Childs, James Kress, Scott Klasky, Jong Youl Choi, Norbert Podhorszki and Matthew Wolf. Their work appears in journals such as CORROSION, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, Review of Accounting Studies, RSC Advances and Contemporary Accounting Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact