Mark Hawk
Impact in
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Parasitic infections in humans and animals
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
-
- Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
Papers in
- Surgery 8
- Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery 2
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 2
- Head and Neck Surgical Oncology 2
-
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 2
- Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications 2
- Co-authors
- Kee D. Kim (3 shared papers)Kiarash Shahlaie (2 shared papers)Jerold H. Theis (2 shared papers)Kern H. Guppy (6 shared papers)Paul T. Akins (5 shared papers)Amit Banerjee (3 shared papers)Yekaterina Axelrod (1 shared paper)Amit Banerjee (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery (2 papers)Neurosurgical FOCUS (1 paper)Journal of neurosurgery (1 paper)Journal of Gerontological Nursing (1 paper)Neurocritical Care (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark Hawk
11 papers receiving 308 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 116
- Neurology 74
- Surgery 210
- Parasitology 29
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 56
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Hawk
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Hawk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Hawk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Hawk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Hawk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Hawk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Hawk. The network helps show where Mark Hawk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Mark Hawk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 97 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 83 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 10 | Parasitic central nervous system infections: echinococcus and schistosoma. | 2005 | 4 |
| 11 | 2012 | 2 |
About Mark Hawk
Mark Hawk is a scholar working on Surgery, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 11 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parasitic infections in humans and animals (2 papers), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (2 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (2 papers), Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (2 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (2 papers) and Poisoning and overdose treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (116 citations), Neurology (74 citations), Surgery (210 citations), Parasitology (29 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (56 citations). Mark Hawk has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kee D. Kim, Kiarash Shahlaie, Jerold H. Theis, Kern H. Guppy, Paul T. Akins, Amit Banerjee, Yekaterina Axelrod, Amit Banerjee, Indro Chakrabarti and Maria C. Inacio. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical FOCUS, Journal of neurosurgery, Journal of Gerontological Nursing and Neurocritical Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.