Mark Goodwin

6.7k citations
112 papers · 4.2k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Goodwin

111 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Mark Goodwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
  • Urban Studies 970
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 737
  • Public Administration 244
  • Finance 581
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.1k
Replace Wendy Brown with:
Wendy Brown Australia
Peter Jackson United Kingdom
Linda Lobao United States
Alan Warde United Kingdom
B.B. Bock Netherlands
Victoria Lawson United States
J.D. van der Ploeg Netherlands
Cees Leeuwis Netherlands
Jonathan Murdoch United Kingdom
Colin Crouch United Kingdom
Mark Goodwin relative to Wendy Brown Australia Wendy Brown's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Wendy Brown · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Goodwin. The network helps show where Mark Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Goodwin Line = papers co-authored together Mark Goodwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999397
2 1998192
3 1996190
4 1992179
5 1999173
6 2013169
7 1993135
8 2018119
9 2005115
10 2014114
11 2001109
12 2016102
13
The Local State and Uneven Development
198899
14 198698
15 199896
16 199694
17 201188
18 199573
19 202071
20 200463

About Mark Goodwin

Mark Goodwin is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Animal Science and Zoology, Infectious Diseases, Finance and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 112 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political and Economic history of UK and US (18 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (15 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (14 papers), Rural development and sustainability (12 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (12 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (11 papers), Coccidia and coccidiosis research (8 papers) and Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (970 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (737 citations), Public Administration (244 citations), Finance (581 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (1.1k citations). Mark Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Gordon MacLeod, Paul Cloke, Simon Duncan, Joe Painter, S. S. Duncan, Paul Milbourne, Andrew Williams, Martin Jones, Simon Pemberton and Philip Crang. Their work appears in journals such as Avian Diseases, Environment and Planning A Economy and Space, Avian Pathology, Journal of Rural Studies and Parliamentary Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact