Mark Gilberg
Impact in
- Conservation top 1%
- Conservation Techniques and Studies
- Archeology top 10%
- Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Papers in
- Conservation 13
- Conservation Techniques and Studies 11
-
- Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies 4
- Insect behavior and control techniques 3
- Co-authors
- Nigel J. Seeley (5 shared papers)David W. Grattan (5 shared papers)Alex Roach (6 shared papers)Claudia Riegel (2 shared papers)John M. Grant (1 shared paper)Nan‐Yao Su (1 shared paper)Jack E. Leonard (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Studies in Conservation (22 papers)Journal of the American Institute for Conservation (6 papers)Curator The Museum Journal (1 paper)AICCM Bulletin (2 papers)APT Bulletin (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
Mark Gilberg
31 papers receiving 229 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Conservation 111
- Archeology 19
- Metals and Alloys 34
- Space and Planetary Science 18
- Archeology 101
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Gilberg
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Gilberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Gilberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Gilberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Gilberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Gilberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Gilberg. The network helps show where Mark Gilberg may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Mark Gilberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1981 | 69 | |
| 2 | 1989 | 33 | |
| 3 | 1987 | 28 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 28 | |
| 5 | 1982 | 25 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 21 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 13 | |
| 8 | 1981 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1989 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1987 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1991 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1986 | 5 | |
| 20 | History of Bronze Disease and Its Treatment | 1988 | 5 |
About Mark Gilberg
Mark Gilberg is a scholar working on Conservation, Insect Science, Plant Science, Space and Planetary Science and Ecology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation Techniques and Studies (11 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (5 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (4 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (4 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (3 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (3 papers) and Building materials and conservation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (111 citations), Archeology (19 citations), Metals and Alloys (34 citations), Space and Planetary Science (18 citations) and Archeology (101 citations). Mark Gilberg has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nigel J. Seeley, David W. Grattan, Alex Roach, Claudia Riegel, John M. Grant, Nan‐Yao Su and Jack E. Leonard. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Conservation, Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, Curator The Museum Journal, AICCM Bulletin and APT Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.