Mark Gilberg

431 citations
34 papers · 320 · h-index 10

Impact in

    • Conservation Techniques and Studies
  • Archeology top 10%
    • Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis

Papers in

Mark Gilberg

31 papers receiving 213 citations

Peers

Mark Gilberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Conservation 107
  • Archeology 18
  • Space and Planetary Science 17
  • Metals and Alloys 31
  • Archeology 94
Replace Dinah Eastop with:
Dinah Eastop United Kingdom
Christophe Moulhérat France
Achim Unger Germany
Wibke Unger Germany
Simona Lazzeri Italy
Cristina Corti Italy
Karin Petersen Germany
M. de Meijer Netherlands
Lídia Catarino Portugal
Gunilla Bok Sweden
Mark Gilberg relative to Dinah Eastop United Kingdom Dinah Eastop's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×31×
Dinah Eastop · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Gilberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Gilberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Gilberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Gilberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Gilberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Gilberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Gilberg. The network helps show where Mark Gilberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Mark Gilberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Gilberg Line = papers co-authored together Mark Gilberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198165
2 198932
3 199127
4 198724
5 198223
6 199418
7 199113
8 198111
9 198910
10 198710
11 19919
12 19908
13 19918
14 19917
15 19947
16 19976
17 19946
18 19865
19 20035
20 19974

About Mark Gilberg

Mark Gilberg is a scholar working on Conservation, Insect Science, Plant Science, Space and Planetary Science and Ecology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation Techniques and Studies (11 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (5 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (4 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (4 papers), Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (3 papers), Building materials and conservation (3 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (107 citations), Archeology (18 citations), Space and Planetary Science (17 citations), Metals and Alloys (31 citations) and Archeology (94 citations). Mark Gilberg has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nigel J. Seeley, David W. Grattan, Claudia Riegel, John M. Grant, Jack E. Leonard and Nan‐Yao Su. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Conservation, Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, Curator The Museum Journal, AICCM Bulletin and APT Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact