Mark Finch
Impact in
-
- Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
- Human-Computer Interaction top 1%
- Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Papers in
-
- Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques 4
-
- Advanced Vision and Imaging 1
- Co-authors
- John Snyder (4 shared papers)Brian Guenter (3 shared papers)Steven M. Drucker (1 shared paper)Desney Tan (1 shared paper)Russell M. Taylor (2 shared papers)Hugues Hoppe (3 shared papers)William R. Mark (2 shared papers)M. R. Falvo (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- ACM Transactions on Graphics (3 papers)Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mark Finch
10 papers receiving 559 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 178
- Human-Computer Interaction 247
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 305
- Cognitive Neuroscience 174
- Media Technology 69
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Finch
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Finch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Finch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Finch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Finch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Finch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Finch. The network helps show where Mark Finch may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Mark Finch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 269 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 183 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 43 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 7 | UNC-CH Force Feedback Library, Revision C | 1996 | 2 |
| 8 | Symbolic Differentiation in GPU Shaders | 2011 | 2 |
| 9 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 1 |
About Mark Finch
Mark Finch is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computational Mechanics and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 10 papers that have together received 601 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (4 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (2 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers), Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (2 papers), Scientific Research and Discoveries (1 paper), Interactive and Immersive Displays (1 paper), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (1 paper) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (178 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (247 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (305 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (174 citations) and Media Technology (69 citations). Mark Finch has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Snyder, Brian Guenter, Steven M. Drucker, Desney Tan, Russell M. Taylor, Hugues Hoppe, William R. Mark, M. R. Falvo, Richard Superfine and S. Washburn. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Graphics and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.