Mark Entwistle

777 citations
26 papers · 599 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Entwistle

26 papers receiving 501 citations

Peers

Mark Entwistle
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Instrumentation 506
  • Biophysics 231
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 17
  • Ophthalmology 122
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 178
Replace Krystyna Slomkowski with:
Krystyna Slomkowski United States
Daniel G. Fouche United States
Nils J. Krichel United Kingdom
James Mooney Ireland
Adriano Della Frera Italy
Daniele Perenzoni Italy
Francesca Madonini Italy
Tarek Al Abbas United Kingdom
Ryan E. Warburton United Kingdom
Xiuliang Chen China
Mark Entwistle relative to Krystyna Slomkowski United States Krystyna Slomkowski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Krystyna Slomkowski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Entwistle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Entwistle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Entwistle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Entwistle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Entwistle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Entwistle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Entwistle. The network helps show where Mark Entwistle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Mark Entwistle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Entwistle Line = papers co-authored together Mark Entwistle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011159
2 201453
3 201541
4 201040
5 201239
6 201238
7 201126
8 201420
9 201020
10 201818
11 201418
12 200917
13 201114
14 200713
15 201013
16 201412
17 201711
18 20149
19 20119
20 20067

About Mark Entwistle

Mark Entwistle is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Biophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ophthalmology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 26 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (25 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (13 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (8 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (6 papers), CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (5 papers), Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials (4 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (506 citations), Biophysics (231 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (17 citations), Ophthalmology (122 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (178 citations). Mark Entwistle has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Itzler, Xudong Jiang, Krystyna Slomkowski, Sabbir Rangwala, Alberto Tosi, Fabio Acerbi, Franco Zappa, S. Cova, Ketan M. Patel and K. A. O’Donnell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Modern Optics, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, Optical Engineering, Journal of airport management and Imaging and Applied Optics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact