Mark E. Stoker
Impact in
-
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
-
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
- Hernia repair and management
- Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
- Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Papers in
-
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders 4
- Surgery 4
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques 2
- Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors 1
- Hernia repair and management 1
- Co-authors
- Baltej S. Maini (2 shared papers)Anthony Martin Gerdes (1 shared paper)Jonathan J. Canete (1 shared paper)Raymond J. Leveillee (1 shared paper)Saleem Islam (1 shared paper)Ali M. Ghellai (1 shared paper)Nilima A. Patwardhan (1 shared paper)Jacob Maciej Buchowski (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Surgical Endoscopy (3 papers)Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery (1 paper)The Anatomical Record (1 paper)Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques (1 paper)Archives of Surgery (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark E. Stoker
9 papers receiving 378 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 254
- Surgery 122
- Anatomy 3
- Hepatology 12
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 29
Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Stoker
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Stoker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Stoker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Stoker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Stoker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Stoker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Stoker. The network helps show where Mark E. Stoker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Stoker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 89 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 82 | |
| 3 | 1982 | 63 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 60 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 30 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 23 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 8 |
About Mark E. Stoker
Mark E. Stoker is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Complementary and alternative medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 9 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (4 papers), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (2 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (1 paper), Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (1 paper), Hernia repair and management (1 paper), Vitamin D Research Studies (1 paper), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (254 citations), Surgery (122 citations), Anatomy (3 citations), Hepatology (12 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (29 citations). Mark E. Stoker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Baltej S. Maini, Anthony Martin Gerdes, Jonathan J. Canete, Raymond J. Leveillee, Saleem Islam, Ali M. Ghellai, Nilima A. Patwardhan, Jacob Maciej Buchowski and Geoffrey E. Stoker. Their work appears in journals such as Surgical Endoscopy, Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, The Anatomical Record, Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques and Archives of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.