Mark E. Stoker
Impact in
-
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
- Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas
- Surgery top 10%
- Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
- Hernia repair and management
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
- Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
Papers in
- Surgery 6
- Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments 3
- Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors 1
-
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders 4
- Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas 3
- Co-authors
- Baltej S. Maini (2 shared papers)A. Martin Gerdes (1 shared paper)Shaheen Islam (1 shared paper)Jonathan J. Canete (1 shared paper)James C. McCann (1 shared paper)Raymond J. Leveillee (1 shared paper)Ali Ghellai (1 shared paper)Saleem Islam (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Surgical Endoscopy (2 papers)The Anatomical Record (1 paper)Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery (1 paper)Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques (1 paper)Archives of Surgery (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark E. Stoker
7 papers receiving 364 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 264
- Surgery 326
- Emergency Medicine 40
- Oncology 88
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 33
Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Stoker
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Stoker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Stoker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Stoker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Stoker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Stoker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Stoker. The network helps show where Mark E. Stoker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Stoker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 87 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 83 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 60 | |
| 4 | 1982 | 56 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 52 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 28 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 24 |
About Mark E. Stoker
Mark E. Stoker is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 7 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (4 papers), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas (3 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (1 paper), Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity (1 paper), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (1 paper), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (1 paper) and Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (264 citations), Surgery (326 citations), Emergency Medicine (40 citations), Oncology (88 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (33 citations). Mark E. Stoker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Baltej S. Maini, A. Martin Gerdes, Shaheen Islam, Jonathan J. Canete, James C. McCann, Raymond J. Leveillee, Ali Ghellai, Saleem Islam and Nilima A. Patwardhan. Their work appears in journals such as Surgical Endoscopy, The Anatomical Record, Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques and Archives of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.