Mark Danton

953 citations
56 papers · 675 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Danton

53 papers receiving 646 citations

Peers

Mark Danton
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 278
  • Epidemiology 268
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 217
  • Surgery 196
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 15
Replace Hidekazu Hirai with:
Hidekazu Hirai Japan
Srinivas Vengala United States
Dale G. Hall United States
Ian Peart United Kingdom
Michael C. Mongé United States
M de Leval United Kingdom
Ruchira Garg United States
Shigeteru Oka Japan
S. Adil Husain United States
Gregory Crooke United States
Mark Danton relative to Hidekazu Hirai Japan Hidekazu Hirai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Hidekazu Hirai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Danton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Danton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Danton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Danton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Danton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Danton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Danton. The network helps show where Mark Danton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Danton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Danton Line = papers co-authored together Mark Danton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199889
2 201380
3 200152
4 200334
5 200631
6 201630
7 199226
8 202025
9 200623
10 200121
11 200919
12 201618
13 201117
14
Smooth muscle tumours of the alimentary tract.
199016
15 200914
16 201812
17 202111
18 200610
19 200910
20 201310

About Mark Danton

Mark Danton is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 56 papers that have together received 675 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (26 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (10 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (9 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (9 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (8 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (5 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (4 papers) and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (278 citations), Epidemiology (268 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (217 citations), Surgery (196 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (15 citations). Mark Danton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include James Pollock, Kenneth MacArthur, Shahzad G. Raja, John G. Byrne, David Young, Fiona Lyall, A J Ritchie, Michael Hsin, J.R. Gibbons and Asimina Kazakidi. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact