Mark Danton

937 citations
54 papers · 637 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Danton

51 papers receiving 616 citations

Peers

Mark Danton
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 368
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 308
  • Epidemiology 303
  • Surgery 284
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 19
Replace Robert J. Moraca with:
Robert J. Moraca United States
Rıza Türköz Türkiye
Brenno Fiorani Italy
Genta Chikazawa Japan
Nathaniel W. Taggart United States
M de Leval United Kingdom
Mark A. Groh United States
Mazen Khoury Greece
Nicolas Mürith Switzerland
Gregory Crooke United States
Mark Danton relative to Robert J. Moraca United States Robert J. Moraca's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Robert J. Moraca · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Danton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Danton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Danton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Danton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Danton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Danton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Danton. The network helps show where Mark Danton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Danton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Danton Line = papers co-authored together Mark Danton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199886
2 201374
3 200150
4 200333
5 201629
6 200626
7 200624
8 199224
9 202023
10 200120
11 200919
12 201617
13 201117
14
Smooth muscle tumours of the alimentary tract.
199016
15 200914
16 201812
17 202111
18 200910
19 20069
20 20139

About Mark Danton

Mark Danton is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 54 papers that have together received 637 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (28 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (12 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (12 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (12 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (10 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (9 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (5 papers) and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (368 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (308 citations), Epidemiology (303 citations), Surgery (284 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (19 citations). Mark Danton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include R. Dobson, James Pollock, Kenneth MacArthur, Shahzad G. Raja, David Young, John G. Byrne, Michael Hsin, Fiona Lyall, A J Ritchie and J.R. Gibbons. Their work appears in journals such as Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact