Mark C. Chames

1.5k citations
32 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Mark C. Chames

30 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Mark C. Chames
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 461
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 231
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 275
  • Physiology 282
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 123
Replace Figen Kır Şahin with:
Figen Kır Şahin Türkiye
Gülengül Köken Türkiye
Gamze Sinem Çağlar Türkiye
Simon Jackson United Kingdom
Luis Villarroel Chile
Giuseppe M. Marinari Italy
Christian Denzer Germany
Tytti Raudaskoski Finland
Larry Cousins United States
Mark C. Chames relative to Figen Kır Şahin Türkiye Figen Kır Şahin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Figen Kır Şahin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark C. Chames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark C. Chames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark C. Chames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark C. Chames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark C. Chames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark C. Chames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark C. Chames. The network helps show where Mark C. Chames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark C. Chames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark C. Chames Line = papers co-authored together Mark C. Chames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002133
2 2012129
3 2012108
4 201381
5 201378
6 200360
7 200649
8 200749
9 200847
10 200346
11 201337
12 201737
13 200932
14 200229
15 201425
16 201515
17 201314
18 201713
19 200912
20 200912

About Mark C. Chames

Mark C. Chames is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Surgery and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (9 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (7 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (6 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (5 papers), Neonatal and Maternal Infections (4 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (4 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (4 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (461 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (231 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (275 citations), Physiology (282 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (123 citations). Mark C. Chames has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and China. Frequent co-authors include Alexandra S. Bullough, Louise M. O’Brien, Ronald D. Chervin, Baha M. Sibai, Jeffrey Livingston, John R. Barton, Jocelynn T. Owusu, Cynthia Brincat, Rita Loch‐Caruso and Thomas Ivester. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Placenta, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology and Biology of Reproduction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact