Mark Brown

116 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Mark Brown
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Insect Science 1.2k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 702
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 243
  • Mechanics of Materials 450
  • Plant Science 666
Replace S. Raghu with:
S. Raghu Australia
David R. Coyle United States
Denys Yemshanov Canada
Jens Dauber Germany
Ben P. Werling United States
Heidi Liere United States
A. J. Haughton United Kingdom
Zhiguo Li China
Marja Kolström Finland
Geerten Hengeveld Netherlands
Mark Brown relative to S. Raghu Australia S. Raghu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
S. Raghu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Brown. The network helps show where Mark Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Brown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Brown Line = papers co-authored together Mark Brown links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 119 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998150
2 200488
3 200373
4 200370
5 201765
6 201961
7 200754
8 200354
9 201351
10 200646
11 200142
12 200340
13 200237
14 201236
15 202035
16 200734
17 199531
18 199129
19 201229
20 197928

About Mark Brown

Mark Brown is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Mechanics of Materials, Plant Science and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 119 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (57 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (36 papers), Plant and animal studies (31 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (26 papers), Forest Management and Policy (20 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (16 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (16 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.2k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (702 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (243 citations), Mechanics of Materials (450 citations) and Plant Science (666 citations). Mark Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Clarissa R. Mathews, Mohammad Reza Ghaffariyan, Stephen S. Miller, Dale G. Bottrell, Mauricio Acuña, Thomas Tworkoski, John Sessions, E. Alan Cameron, Raffaele Spinelli and Henry W. Hogmire. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Entomology, Journal of Economic Entomology, BioControl, Australian Forestry and Forests.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact