Mark Blades

135 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Mark Blades
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Geography, Planning and Development 695
  • Automotive Engineering 1.4k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.4k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 411
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 819
Replace Alexander W. Siegel with:
Alexander W. Siegel United States
Daniel Voyer Canada
Francesca Pazzaglia Italy
Elizabeth Tipton United States
Susan D. Voyer Canada
Sheldon H. White United States
Lynn S. Liben United States
David H. Uttal United States
Lars Kuchinke Germany
Steven G. Vandenberg United States
Mark Blades relative to Alexander W. Siegel United States Alexander W. Siegel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Alexander W. Siegel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Blades

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Blades's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Blades with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Blades more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Blades

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Blades. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Blades. The network helps show where Mark Blades may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Blades, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Blades Line = papers co-authored together Mark Blades links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 140 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006342
2 2006154
3 2002134
4 1998132
5 2001119
6 1990115
7 2000100
8 200686
9 200481
10 200380
11 199878
12 199478
13 198975
14 200073
15 199770
16 199469
17 200368
18 200862
19 199562
20 199859

About Mark Blades

Mark Blades is a scholar working on Automotive Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Geography, Planning and Development and Social Psychology, having authored 140 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spatial Cognition and Navigation (70 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (26 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (21 papers), Geography Education and Pedagogy (21 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (19 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (17 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (11 papers) and Categorization, perception, and language (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (695 citations), Automotive Engineering (1.4k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k citations), Human-Computer Interaction (411 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (819 citations). Mark Blades has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Spencer, Christine Eiser, Simon Ungar, Amanda Waterman, Caroline Oates, Emily K. Farran, Rob Kitchin, Reginald G. Golledge, Barrie Gunter and Kim P. Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Applied Cognitive Psychology and Research in Developmental Disabilities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact