Mark Ashdown
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.05%
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 0.5%
- Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Papers in
-
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 95
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 86
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 47
- Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology 43
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 23
-
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena 51
- Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena 42
- Co-authors
- Michael P. Hobson (1 shared paper)Jeremy F. Taylor (1 shared paper)Benjamin D. Wandelt (1 shared paper)Krzysztof M. Gorski (1 shared paper)Daniel J. Mortlock (1 shared paper)Anthony Challinor (1 shared paper)Mohamed Henini (1 shared paper)Evgenii E. Vdovin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Astronomy and Astrophysics (103 papers)Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (17 papers)Physical Review B (1 paper)Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (4 papers)Journal of Mathematical Physics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ItalyFranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark Ashdown
179 papers receiving 45.6k citations
Mark Ashdown's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 43.5k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 24.4k
- Instrumentation 4.9k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 2.9k
- Oceanography 2.0k
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Ashdown
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Ashdown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Ashdown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Ashdown more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Ashdown
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Ashdown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Ashdown. The network helps show where Mark Ashdown may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Ashdown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 184 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Planck 2015 results Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 8099 |
| 2 | Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 4815 |
| 3 | Planck 2015 results Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 4714 |
| 4 | Planck 2018 results Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 1455 |
| 5 | Planck 2015 results Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 1227 |
| 6 | Planck 2018 results Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 1214 |
| 7 | Planck 2015 results Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 1025 |
| 8 | Planck 2015 results Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 893 |
| 9 | Planck 2013 results. XXII. Constraints on inflation Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 800 |
| 10 | Planck2015 results Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 697 |
| 11 | Planck 2013 results. VII. HFI time response and beams Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 622 |
| 12 | Planck2013 results. XI. All-sky model of thermal dust emission Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 607 |
| 13 | Planck2015 results Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 553 |
| 14 | Planck 2015 results Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 546 |
| 15 | Planck 2018 results Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 520 |
| 16 | Planck 2015 results Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 516 |
| 17 | Planck2013 results. XX. Cosmology from Sunyaev–Zeldovich cluster counts Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 467 |
| 18 | Planck 2015 results: XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 400 |
| 19 | Planck2015 results Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 398 |
| 20 | Planck2013 results. XV. CMB power spectra and likelihood Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 395 |
About Mark Ashdown
Mark Ashdown is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Oceanography, having authored 184 papers that have together received 47.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (95 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (86 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (51 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (47 papers), Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology (43 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (42 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (23 papers) and Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (43.5k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (24.4k citations), Instrumentation (4.9k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (2.9k citations) and Oceanography (2.0k citations). Mark Ashdown has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael P. Hobson, Jeremy F. Taylor, Benjamin D. Wandelt, Krzysztof M. Gorski, Daniel J. Mortlock, Anthony Challinor, Mohamed Henini, Evgenii E. Vdovin, A. Patanè and Yu. N. Khanin. Their work appears in journals such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Physical Review B, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics and Journal of Mathematical Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.