Mark Andrew Mitchell

98 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Mark Andrew Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
  • Parasitology 588
  • Virology 250
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 447
  • Small Animals 177
  • Equine 27
Replace C. H. Gardiner with:
C. H. Gardiner United States
Christine Kreuder Johnson United States
K. S. Warren Australia
Craig Stephen Canada
BRETT T. ELKIN Canada
Kathleen A. Alexander United States
Katherine F. Smith United States
R. Mitchell Bush United States
Colin J. Carlson United States
Neil Forbes United Kingdom
Mark Andrew Mitchell relative to C. H. Gardiner United States C. H. Gardiner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
C. H. Gardiner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Andrew Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Andrew Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Andrew Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Andrew Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Andrew Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Andrew Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Andrew Mitchell. The network helps show where Mark Andrew Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Andrew Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Andrew Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Mark Andrew Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 106 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995204
2 2009162
3 1995105
4 201372
5 201266
6 201165
7
Thermography : current status and advances in livestock animals and in veterinary medicine
201357
8 199956
9 201049
10 200948
11 200645
12 197540
13 200834
14 200932
15 201128
16 201327
17 201026
18 200823
19 201021
20 201621

About Mark Andrew Mitchell

Mark Andrew Mitchell is a scholar working on Parasitology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Virology, Animal Science and Zoology and Ecology, having authored 106 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Turtle Biology and Conservation (23 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (16 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (9 papers), Rabies epidemiology and control (9 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (8 papers), Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (7 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (6 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (588 citations), Virology (250 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (447 citations), Small Animals (177 citations) and Equine (27 citations). Mark Andrew Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hungary and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Matthew C. Allender, S. K. Shen, Oliver C.H. Kwok, Mateus-Pinilla Nohra, Uriel D. Kitron, Philippe Thulliez, J. P. Dubey, K. S. Todd, R. M. Weigel and Alessandro Mannelli. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery, Journal of Wildlife Diseases, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Veterinary Clinics of North America Exotic Animal Practice and Journal of Wildlife Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact