Mark A. Scheel
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
-
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Papers in
-
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 8
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 5
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 2
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 1
-
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics 5
- Co-authors
- Saul A. Teukolsky (5 shared papers)Thomas W. Baumgarte (1 shared paper)Stuart L. Shapiro (1 shared paper)Gregory B. Cook (1 shared paper)Larry Kidder (6 shared papers)Michael Boyle (5 shared papers)Keefe Mitman (5 shared papers)Jordan Moxon (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Physical review. D (6 papers)Physical Review Letters (1 paper)Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mark A. Scheel
8 papers receiving 111 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 12
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 102
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 23
- Oceanography 21
- Geophysics 16
- Ocean Engineering 11
Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Scheel
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Scheel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Scheel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Scheel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Scheel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Scheel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Scheel. The network helps show where Mark A. Scheel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark A. Scheel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 81 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 11 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2025 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 1 |
About Mark A. Scheel
Mark A. Scheel is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 8 papers that have together received 115 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (8 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (5 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (2 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (1 paper) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (102 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (23 citations), Oceanography (21 citations), Geophysics (16 citations) and Ocean Engineering (11 citations). Mark A. Scheel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Saul A. Teukolsky, Thomas W. Baumgarte, Stuart L. Shapiro, Gregory B. Cook, Larry Kidder, Michael Boyle, Keefe Mitman, Jordan Moxon, Nils Deppe and William Throwe. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, Physical Review Letters and Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.