Mark A. Bonta

30 papers receiving 262 citations

Peers

Mark A. Bonta
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 60
  • Geography, Planning and Development 23
  • Ecology 61
  • Global and Planetary Change 49
  • Cultural Studies 17
Replace Yance de Fretes with:
Yance de Fretes United States
Heather I. McKillop United States
Robin W. Doughty United States
Paul Martín China
Débora Peterson Brazil
Sheherazade Sheherazade Indonesia
László Sáfián Hungary
Andrea Kaus United States
Sarah Walshaw United States
Martin Walsh United Kingdom
Mark A. Bonta relative to Yance de Fretes United States Yance de Fretes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Yance de Fretes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Bonta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Bonta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Bonta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Bonta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Bonta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Bonta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Bonta. The network helps show where Mark A. Bonta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Mark A. Bonta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark A. Bonta Line = papers co-authored together Mark A. Bonta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201779
2 200428
3 201922
4 200617
5 201917
6 201016
7 201116
8
Birding Honduras : a checklist and guide
200312
9 201210
10 20049
11 20078
12
VALORIZING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PEOPLE AND BIRDS: EXPERIENCES AND LESSONS FROM HONDURAS
20088
13 20127
14 20186
15 20074
16 20114
17 20124
18 20184
19 20073
20 20093

About Mark A. Bonta

Mark A. Bonta is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Geography, Planning and Development, Ecology, Plant Science and Philosophy, having authored 33 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean (9 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (8 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (5 papers), Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis (4 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (3 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers), Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond (2 papers) and Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (60 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (23 citations), Ecology (61 citations), Global and Planetary Change (49 citations) and Cultural Studies (17 citations). Mark A. Bonta has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include John L. Protevi, JODY L. HAYNES, Andrew P. Vovides, Angélica Cibrián‐Jaramillo, María Teresa Pulido Silva, Spencer G. Lucas, Juan Antonio Reyes‐Agüero, Laura Yáñez Espinosa, Guillermo E. Alvarado Induni and Sean McCann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnobiology, GeoJournal, Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, SubStance and ACME.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact