Malcolm Robert Macleod
Impact in
- Small Animals top 0.01%
- Animal testing and alternatives
- Neurology top 0.05%
- Neurological Disorders and Treatments
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 66
-
- Animal testing and alternatives 60
- Co-authors
- Emily S. Sena (84 shared papers)Geoffrey Alan Donnan (25 shared papers)David William Howells (51 shared papers)H. Bart van der Worp (27 shared papers)Stephen M. Davis (5 shared papers)Marc Fisher (5 shared papers)Victoria E. O’Collins (15 shared papers)Gillian L. Currie (17 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (19 papers)Stroke (15 papers)International Journal of Stroke (13 papers)PLoS Biology (13 papers)Wellcome Open Research (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaGermany
In The Last Decade
Malcolm Robert Macleod
314 papers receiving 38.3k citations
Malcolm Robert Macleod's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 208
- Small Animals 3.6k
- Neurology 3.2k
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 2.9k
- Rehabilitation 1.3k
- Neurology 2.6k
Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Robert Macleod
This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Robert Macleod's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Robert Macleod with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Robert Macleod more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Robert Macleod
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Robert Macleod. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Robert Macleod. The network helps show where Malcolm Robert Macleod may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Robert Macleod, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 324 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 4220 |
| 2 | The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 3309 |
| 3 | Stroke Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 1959 |
| 4 | Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 1938 |
| 5 | Ischaemic stroke Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 1353 |
| 6 | 1,026 Experimental treatments in acute stroke Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 1209 |
| 7 | Incidence, prevalence, and predictors of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 1202 |
| 8 | Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 1170 |
| 9 | Can Animal Models of Disease Reliably Inform Human Studies? Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 1062 |
| 10 | The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research* Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 1036 |
| 11 | Neurological and neuropsychiatric complications of COVID-19 in 153 patients: a UK-wide surveillance study Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 984 |
| 12 | A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 967 |
| 13 | The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 745 |
| 14 | Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 652 |
| 15 | 2004 | 573 | |
| 16 | Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 485 |
| 17 | 2010 | 472 | |
| 18 | The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 459 |
| 19 | 2013 | 405 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 401 |
About Malcolm Robert Macleod
Malcolm Robert Macleod is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Small Animals, Epidemiology, Neurology and Neurology, having authored 324 papers that have together received 39.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (66 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (60 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (51 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (15 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (12 papers), Thermal Regulation in Medicine (11 papers), Research Data Management Practices (10 papers) and Mesenchymal stem cell research (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (3.6k citations), Neurology (3.2k citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (2.9k citations), Rehabilitation (1.3k citations) and Neurology (2.6k citations). Malcolm Robert Macleod has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Emily S. Sena, Geoffrey Alan Donnan, David William Howells, H. Bart van der Worp, Stephen M. Davis, Marc Fisher, Victoria E. O’Collins, Gillian L. Currie, Laura L. Horky and H. M. Vesterinen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, Stroke, International Journal of Stroke, PLoS Biology and Wellcome Open Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.