Malcolm Privette

445 citations
9 papers · 326 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Malcolm Privette

9 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

Malcolm Privette
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 50
  • Hepatology 31
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 58
  • Gastroenterology 16
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 59
Replace Suying Yan with:
Suying Yan China
Michiel A. van Nieuwenhoven Netherlands
Gerrit H. de Groot Netherlands
E. L. Frederickson United States
Jens Berrang Germany
M. D. Weidner United States
Brock-Utne Jg South Africa
Martin B.M. de Smet Netherlands
Robin D. Rothstein United States
Jenny Foster United States
Malcolm Privette relative to Suying Yan China Suying Yan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Suying Yan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Privette

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Privette's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Privette with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Privette more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Privette

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Privette. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Privette. The network helps show where Malcolm Privette may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Privette, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm Privette Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm Privette links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2000129
2 198470
3 198752
4 200137
5 199218
6 199211
7 20087
8 19901
9 19781

About Malcolm Privette

Malcolm Privette is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Physiology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Nephrology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (2 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (2 papers), Sports Performance and Training (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper) and Body Composition Measurement Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (50 citations), Hepatology (31 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (58 citations), Gastroenterology (16 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (59 citations). Malcolm Privette has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Robert Cade, Herbert Wagemaker, Melvin J. Fregly, Zhongjie Sun, Donald R. Mars, Neil E. Rowland, Christian Zauner, J. Robert Cade, J Peterson and John C. Peterson. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Medicine, Amino Acids, ˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journals, Resuscitation and Nutritional Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact