M. Weilert

1.7k citations
30 papers · 365 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

M. Weilert

30 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers

M. Weilert
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Physiology 57
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 97
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 131
  • Instrumentation 11
  • Computational Mechanics 46
Replace Yuko Inatomi with:
Yuko Inatomi Japan
C. Paine United States
William K. Witherow United States
E. Tward United States
T. Gonda Japan
Pierre Thibault France
T. Poppe Germany
Bruno Issenmann France
K. Ernst Poland
В. И. Архипенко Belarus
M. Weilert relative to Yuko Inatomi Japan Yuko Inatomi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Yuko Inatomi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Weilert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Weilert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Weilert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Weilert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Weilert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Weilert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Weilert. The network helps show where M. Weilert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Weilert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Weilert Line = papers co-authored together M. Weilert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199694
2 200956
3 199337
4 199733
5 199522
6 199320
7 199819
8 199812
9 20048
10 20047
11 19996
12 19986
13 20055
14 20105
15 20105
16 20104
17 20014
18
An inexpensive side-looking radar with a novel display
19753
19 20103
20 20062

About M. Weilert

M. Weilert is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Computational Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 30 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (7 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (7 papers), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (7 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (5 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer (4 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (4 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (4 papers) and Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (57 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (97 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (131 citations), Instrumentation (11 citations) and Computational Mechanics (46 citations). M. Weilert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include G. M. Seidel, Dwight Whitaker, Humphrey J. Maris, J. P. Wolfe, A. C. Anderson, C. L. Vicente, Inseob Hahn, M. Barmatz, Jason Kapit and M. H. Hecht. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Low Temperature Physics, Review of Scientific Instruments, Physical Review Letters, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and The European Physical Journal B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact