M. Scanlan
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
-
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 12
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 5
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 3
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 2
-
- Geophysics and Gravity Measurements 5
- Co-authors
- Johanna T. Dwyer (1 shared paper)K. Ann Coleman (1 shared paper)Phillip Sullivan (1 shared paper)Elizabeth A. Krall (1 shared paper)Gan Yang (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical Journal (2 papers)Reports on Progress in Physics (1 paper)Physical Review Letters (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)Journal of Gerontology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
M. Scanlan
14 papers receiving 1.9k citations
M. Scanlan's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.6k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 430
- Oceanography 299
- Geophysics 267
- Ocean Engineering 247
Countries citing papers authored by M. Scanlan
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Scanlan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Scanlan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Scanlan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Scanlan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Scanlan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Scanlan. The network helps show where M. Scanlan may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside M. Scanlan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LIGO: the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 913 |
| 2 | 2009 | 250 | |
| 3 | An upper limit on the stochastic gravitational-wave background of cosmological origin | 2009 | 167 |
| 4 | 2009 | 112 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 91 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 74 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 69 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 69 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 64 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 48 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 43 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 42 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 30 |
About M. Scanlan
M. Scanlan is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Ocean Engineering and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (12 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (5 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (5 papers), Geophysics and Sensor Technology (3 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (3 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (2 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers) and Statistical and numerical algorithms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.6k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (430 citations), Oceanography (299 citations), Geophysics (267 citations) and Ocean Engineering (247 citations). M. Scanlan has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Johanna T. Dwyer, K. Ann Coleman, Phillip Sullivan, Elizabeth A. Krall and Gan Yang. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Reports on Progress in Physics, Physical Review Letters, Nature and Journal of Gerontology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.