M. S. Meyer
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 44
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 18
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 10
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 8
- Oceanography 16
- Geophysics and Gravity Measurements 16
M. S. Meyer
44 papers receiving 5.9k citations
M. S. Meyer's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 4.9k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.1k
- Geophysics 804
- Oceanography 740
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by M. S. Meyer
This map shows the geographic impact of M. S. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. S. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. S. Meyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. S. Meyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. S. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. S. Meyer. The network helps show where M. S. Meyer may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Characterization of the LIGO detectors during their sixth science run Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 968 |
| 2 | LIGO: the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 913 |
| 3 | Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 843 |
| 4 | Predictions for the rates of compact binary coalescences observable by ground-based gravitational-wave detectors Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 812 |
| 5 | 2012 | 174 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 120 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 112 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 106 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 106 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 102 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 98 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 95 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 94 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 92 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 92 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 91 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 88 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 77 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 74 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 72 |
About M. S. Meyer
M. S. Meyer is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Ocean Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 44 papers that have together received 6.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (44 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (18 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (16 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (10 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (8 papers), Geophysics and Sensor Technology (5 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (5 papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (4.9k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.1k citations), Geophysics (804 citations), Oceanography (740 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.5k citations). M. S. Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Classical and Quantum Gravity, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Reports on Progress in Physics and Astronomy and Astrophysics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.