M. Garber

1.3k citations
69 papers · 671 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

M. Garber

64 papers receiving 617 citations

Peers

M. Garber
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Condensed Matter Physics 410
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 154
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 232
  • Biomedical Engineering 276
  • Geophysics 62
Replace H. A. Leupold with:
H. A. Leupold United States
S.A.J. Wiegers Netherlands
Julian Lock India
R. Noer United States
H. H. Sample United States
R. W. Shaw United States
L. Y. L. Shen United States
J.M. Corsan United Kingdom
A. Ravex France
P. B. Miller United States
M. Garber relative to H. A. Leupold United States H. A. Leupold's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
H. A. Leupold · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Garber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Garber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Garber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Garber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Garber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Garber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Garber. The network helps show where M. Garber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Garber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Garber Line = papers co-authored together M. Garber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196958
2 196048
3 199531
4 197429
5 198928
6 199526
7 196525
8 197524
9 196424
10 196424
11 196723
12 196321
13 197420
14 199016
15 196716
16 197416
17 197114
18 196014
19 198913
20 195613

About M. Garber

M. Garber is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Condensed Matter Physics, Aerospace Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 69 papers that have together received 671 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Superconducting Materials and Applications (45 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (27 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (25 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (21 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (7 papers), HVDC Systems and Fault Protection (7 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (5 papers) and Magnetism in coordination complexes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (410 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (154 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (232 citations), Biomedical Engineering (276 citations) and Geophysics (62 citations). M. Garber has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include M. Suenaga, E. B. Osgood, J. F. Bussière, D.G. Schweitzer, W. P. Kirk, A. Ghosh, W. B. Sampson, F. J. Blatt, J. F. Cochran and C. A. Shiffman. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Physical Review Letters, Journal of Applied Physics and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact