M. E. Post

537 citations
22 papers · 457 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

M. E. Post

21 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers

M. E. Post
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 162
  • Computational Mechanics 177
  • Filtration and Separation 12
  • Organic Chemistry 134
  • Biomedical Engineering 158
Replace K. J. Young with:
K. J. Young United Kingdom
R.F. Hilbert Germany
П. В. Скрипов Russia
Antonio M. Vincitore United States
Simón Reif-Acherman Colombia
W. Leidenfrost United States
K. Anders Germany
Robbin C. Anderson United States
Nikolaos I. Diamantonis Greece
George W. Swift United States
M. E. Post relative to K. J. Young United Kingdom K. J. Young's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
K. J. Young · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. E. Post

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. E. Post's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. E. Post with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. E. Post more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. E. Post

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. E. Post. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. E. Post. The network helps show where M. E. Post may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. E. Post, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. E. Post Line = papers co-authored together M. E. Post links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989115
2 199456
3 198141
4 198127
5 199124
6 198122
7 198321
8 199521
9 198220
10 198215
11 199115
12 199414
13 198913
14 199112
15 198110
16 199010
17 19779
18 19815
19 19933
20 19932

About M. E. Post

M. E. Post is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Ocean Engineering, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Organic Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 22 papers that have together received 457 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and flame dynamics (10 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (8 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (7 papers), Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (6 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (6 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (5 papers), Heat transfer and supercritical fluids (2 papers) and Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (162 citations), Computational Mechanics (177 citations), Filtration and Separation (12 citations), Organic Chemistry (134 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (158 citations). M. E. Post has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Larry Goss, A. Anton Smith, Jeppe Christensen, Reed M. Izatt, D. D. Trump, William L. Roberts, James F. Driscoll, Scott D. Collins, E. Grant Jones and Robert D. Hancock. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, Review of Scientific Instruments, Journal of Laser Applications, Combustion Science and Technology and IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact