M. Dresden

1.6k citations
53 papers · 994 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

M. Dresden

52 papers receiving 919 citations

Peers

M. Dresden
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 286
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 640
  • Condensed Matter Physics 184
  • History and Philosophy of Science 67
  • Artificial Intelligence 217
Replace J. F. Cornwell with:
J. F. Cornwell United Kingdom
C. A. Hurst Australia
Jakob Yngvason Austria
Geoffrey L. Sewell United Kingdom
W. Heisenberg Germany
Charles P. Enz Switzerland
L. Fonda Italy
Virendra Singh India
M. Froissart France
Colin J. Thompson Australia
M. Dresden relative to J. F. Cornwell United Kingdom J. F. Cornwell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.6×
J. F. Cornwell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Dresden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Dresden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Dresden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Dresden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Dresden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Dresden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Dresden. The network helps show where M. Dresden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside M. Dresden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Dresden Line = papers co-authored together M. Dresden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1970381
2 199273
3 196157
4 197956
5 197238
6 195428
7 196722
8 196922
9 198821
10 198820
11 196920
12 197920
13 198319
14 199517
15 196917
16 197115
17 199614
18 196913
19 197213
20 197511

About M. Dresden

M. Dresden is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Condensed Matter Physics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 53 papers that have together received 994 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (14 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (6 papers), Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (6 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (4 papers), International Science and Diplomacy (4 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (4 papers) and Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (286 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (640 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (184 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (67 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (217 citations). M. Dresden has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Eytan Barouch, Barry M. McCoy, David C. Cassidy, Chen Ning Yang, V. M. Kenkre, Nikos Angelos Salingaros, Lillian Hoddeson, Laurie M. Brown, Danny K.Y. Wong and Richard Gass. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Today, Physical Review Letters, Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena, Reviews of Modern Physics and Journal of Statistical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact