M. Cirillo

1.9k citations
125 papers · 1.6k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

M. Cirillo

120 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

M. Cirillo
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Condensed Matter Physics 723
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 481
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 984
  • Computer Networks and Communications 327
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 110
Replace R. Monaco with:
R. Monaco Italy
A. Barone Italy
Daniel Domı́nguez Argentina
C. J. Lobb United States
M. V. Fistul Germany
R. Cristiano Italy
E. Goldobin Germany
G. Rotoli Italy
V. A. Yampol’skiı̆ Ukraine
Stavros Komineas Greece
M. Cirillo relative to R. Monaco Italy R. Monaco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
R. Monaco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Cirillo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Cirillo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Cirillo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Cirillo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Cirillo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Cirillo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Cirillo. The network helps show where M. Cirillo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Cirillo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Cirillo Line = papers co-authored together M. Cirillo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 125 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993129
2 199391
3 198188
4 199882
5 198269
6 199563
7 201554
8 200849
9 199648
10 198747
11 200447
12 201240
13 200535
14 198131
15 198525
16 199325
17 201123
18 198621
19 198920
20 200220

About M. Cirillo

M. Cirillo is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 125 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (51 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (38 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (25 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (19 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (17 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (14 papers), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (14 papers) and Nonlinear Photonic Systems (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (723 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (481 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (984 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (327 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (110 citations). M. Cirillo has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Niels Grønbech‐Jensen, A. V. Ustinov, N. F. Pedersen, Boris A. Malomed, James A. Blackburn, P. Carelli, M. Lucci, F. L. Lloyd, M. G. Castellano and M. Salvato. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Physics Letters A, Physical Review B and IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact