Luke E. Dodd

22 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Luke E. Dodd
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 293
  • Ecological Modeling 5
  • Space and Planetary Science 2
  • Ecology 42
  • Insect Science 19
Replace Aitor Arrizabalaga‐Escudero with:
Aitor Arrizabalaga‐Escudero Spain
Diogo F. Ferreira Portugal
Егоров Леонид Валентинович Russia
Paul E. Skelley United States
Toshko Ljubomirov Bulgaria
Michael P. Simanonok United States
Scott D. Grindal Canada
Dariusz Skarżyński Poland
Frédéric Chérot Belgium
Rosaly Ale‐Rocha Brazil
Luke E. Dodd relative to Aitor Arrizabalaga‐Escudero Spain Aitor Arrizabalaga‐Escudero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Aitor Arrizabalaga‐Escudero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luke E. Dodd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke E. Dodd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke E. Dodd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke E. Dodd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke E. Dodd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke E. Dodd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke E. Dodd. The network helps show where Luke E. Dodd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Luke E. Dodd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luke E. Dodd Line = papers co-authored together Luke E. Dodd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200979
2 201271
3 200835
4 201234
5 200733
6 201625
7 201515
8 201714
9 20078
10 20228
11 20116
12 20156
13 20125
14 20144
15 20194
16 20224
17 20213
18
Using LiDAR to Link Forest Canopy Structure with Bat Activity and Insect Occurrence: Preliminary Findings
20132
19 20182
20 20091

About Luke E. Dodd

Luke E. Dodd is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Genetics, Global and Planetary Change and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 22 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (17 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (3 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (1 paper), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (1 paper) and Entomological Studies and Ecology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (293 citations), Ecological Modeling (5 citations), Space and Planetary Science (2 citations), Ecology (42 citations) and Insect Science (19 citations). Luke E. Dodd has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Lacki, Lynne K. Rieske, Matthew B. Dickinson, Joseph Samuel Johnson, Michael D. Baker, Patrick D. Keyser, Amanda D. Rodewald, Eric G. Chapman, Eric R. Britzke and Jeffrey L. Larkin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mammalogy, Forest Ecology and Management, International Journal of Wildland Fire, Conservation Physiology and Acta Chiropterologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact