Lukas Schmidt

24 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers

Lukas Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Pharmacy 23
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 61
  • Pharmacology 29
  • Insect Science 42
  • Electrochemistry 18
Replace Muhammad Umer Farooq Awan with:
Muhammad Umer Farooq Awan Pakistan
Mohamed A. H. Fahmy Egypt
Jędrzej Proch Poland
Haitao Liu China
Shuai Guan China
Mohammad Iqbal Pakistan
Utsab Deb India
Michael D. David United States
Alberto Pasamontes United States
Yan S. Ding United States
Lukas Schmidt relative to Muhammad Umer Farooq Awan Pakistan Muhammad Umer Farooq Awan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Muhammad Umer Farooq Awan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lukas Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lukas Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lukas Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lukas Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lukas Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lukas Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lukas Schmidt. The network helps show where Lukas Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lukas Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lukas Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Lukas Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200978
2 201663
3 201542
4 201642
5 201237
6 202136
7 201234
8 201530
9 201729
10 201629
11 201628
12 202119
13 201415
14 201313
15 201610
16 20158
17 20227
18 20187
19 20146
20 20144

About Lukas Schmidt

Lukas Schmidt is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Ocean Engineering and Spectroscopy, having authored 24 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (3 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (3 papers), Aeolian processes and effects (3 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (3 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (3 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (2 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers) and Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (23 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (61 citations), Pharmacology (29 citations), Insect Science (42 citations) and Electrochemistry (18 citations). Lukas Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Göen, Thomas Brückner, Felix Nickel, Lars Fischer, Beat P. Müller‐Stich, Johannes Müller, Peter Stephan, Nitin Karwa, Markus W. Büchler and Peter Schreier. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Toxicology, Analytica Chimica Acta, Atmospheric chemistry and physics, Physical review. E and Medical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact