Luís Mendes

42 papers receiving 558 citations

Peers

Luís Mendes
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Ophthalmology 182
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 15
  • Signal Processing 133
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 233
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 134
Replace Miguel Ángel Fernández Granero with:
Miguel Ángel Fernández Granero Spain
Aaron Wu United States
Derek C. Stanford United States
Kenneth R. Persons United States
A. Mosquera Spain
Jie Zhong China
András Zolnay Netherlands
Mingquan Lin United States
Shanshan Cui China
Luís Mendes relative to Miguel Ángel Fernández Granero Spain Miguel Ángel Fernández Granero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.5×
Miguel Ángel Fernández Granero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luís Mendes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luís Mendes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luís Mendes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luís Mendes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luís Mendes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luís Mendes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luís Mendes. The network helps show where Luís Mendes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luís Mendes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luís Mendes Line = papers co-authored together Luís Mendes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019176
2 201837
3 202031
4 201529
5 201227
6 202026
7 202119
8 202118
9 201617
10 202214
11 202114
12 201014
13 201614
14 202110
15 20239
16 20179
17 20169
18 20228
19 20227
20 20067

About Luís Mendes

Luís Mendes is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiation and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 49 papers that have together received 568 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (17 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques (7 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (6 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (6 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (4 papers), Music and Audio Processing (4 papers) and Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (182 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (15 citations), Signal Processing (133 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (233 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (134 citations). Luís Mendes has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include José Cunha‐Vaz, Inês Marques, Ana Rita Santos, P. Carvalho, Rui Pedro Paiva, Torcato Santos, Conceição Lobo, Nicos Maglaveras, Ioanna Chouvarda and Evangelos Kaimakamis. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology and Therapy, Journal of Personalized Medicine, Physiological Measurement, Ophthalmic Research and Journal of Clinical Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact