Lucas Hackl

997 citations
27 papers · 542 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Lucas Hackl

25 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers

Lucas Hackl
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 253
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 438
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 133
  • Computational Mathematics 5
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 87
Replace Aranya Bhattacharya with:
Aranya Bhattacharya India
Hugo A. Camargo Germany
Ruihua Fan United States
Sebastian Erne Austria
Amilcar R. de Queiroz Brazil
Y. Y. Atas France
Valentin Kasper Spain
Amos Chan United States
Peter Orland United States
István M. Szécsényi United Kingdom
Lucas Hackl relative to Aranya Bhattacharya India Aranya Bhattacharya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.4×
Aranya Bhattacharya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lucas Hackl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lucas Hackl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lucas Hackl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lucas Hackl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lucas Hackl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lucas Hackl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lucas Hackl. The network helps show where Lucas Hackl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lucas Hackl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lucas Hackl Line = papers co-authored together Lucas Hackl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201782
2 201966
3 201852
4 202142
5 201935
6 201834
7 201528
8 202127
9 201923
10 202120
11 201617
12 201916
13 201313
14 202113
15 202212
16 201911
17 20239
18
Aspects of Gaussian States Entanglement, Squeezing and Complexity
20189
19 20226
20 20215

About Lucas Hackl

Lucas Hackl is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 542 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum many-body systems (16 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (7 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (7 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (5 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (4 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (4 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (4 papers) and Quantum and electron transport phenomena (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (253 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (438 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (133 citations), Computational Mathematics (5 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (87 citations). Lucas Hackl has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Eugenio Bianchi, Marcos Rigol, Lev Vidmar, Mario Kieburg, Jens Eisert, Michał P. Heller, Shira Chapman, Ro Jefferson, Hugo Marrochio and Ranjan Modak. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B., Physical review. D, Physical Review Letters, Physical review. A and Physical Review Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact