Lucas Hackl

1.0k citations
28 papers · 593 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Lucas Hackl

27 papers receiving 590 citations

Peers

Lucas Hackl
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 263
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 478
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 139
  • Computational Mathematics 5
  • Artificial Intelligence 194
Replace Ruihua Fan with:
Ruihua Fan United States
Valentin Kasper Spain
Amos Chan United States
Peter Orland United States
Lucas Sá Portugal
Filiberto Ares Italy
Sara Murciano Italy
Yijian Zou United States
Dimitri Gioev United States
Giuseppe Di Giulio Italy
Lucas Hackl relative to Ruihua Fan United States Ruihua Fan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ruihua Fan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lucas Hackl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lucas Hackl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lucas Hackl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lucas Hackl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lucas Hackl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lucas Hackl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lucas Hackl. The network helps show where Lucas Hackl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lucas Hackl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lucas Hackl Line = papers co-authored together Lucas Hackl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201788
2 201969
3 201857
4 202145
5 201938
6 201835
7 201530
8 202129
9 201925
10 202123
11 201919
12 201617
13 202215
14 202114
15 201313
16 201912
17 202311
18
Aspects of Gaussian States Entanglement, Squeezing and Complexity
20189
19 20227
20 20256

About Lucas Hackl

Lucas Hackl is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Artificial Intelligence and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 593 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum many-body systems (17 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (8 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (7 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (5 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (4 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (4 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (4 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (263 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (478 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (139 citations), Computational Mathematics (5 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (194 citations). Lucas Hackl has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Eugenio Bianchi, Marcos Rigol, Lev Vidmar, Mario Kieburg, Michał P. Heller, Jens Eisert, Robert Cobb Myers, Shira Chapman, Ro Jefferson and Hugo Marrochio. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B., Physical review. D, Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A and SciPost Physics Core.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact