Luca Angius

1.3k citations
36 papers · 983 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Luca Angius

33 papers receiving 964 citations

Peers

Luca Angius
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Neurology 518
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 150
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 95
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 208
  • Rehabilitation 65
Replace Daniel Gomes da Silva Machado with:
Daniel Gomes da Silva Machado Brazil
Simranjit K. Sidhu Australia
Ashlyn K. Frazer Australia
Gonzalo Márquez Spain
Callum G. Brownstein United Kingdom
Atsuo Maruyama Japan
Julien Duclay France
Ashlee M. Hendy Australia
Stéphane Baudry Belgium
Jakob Škarabot United Kingdom
Luca Angius relative to Daniel Gomes da Silva Machado Brazil Daniel Gomes da Silva Machado's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×43×
Daniel Gomes da Silva Machado · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luca Angius

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luca Angius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luca Angius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luca Angius more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luca Angius

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luca Angius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luca Angius. The network helps show where Luca Angius may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luca Angius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luca Angius Line = papers co-authored together Luca Angius links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016119
2 2017111
3 201799
4 201997
5 201577
6 201847
7 201546
8 202041
9 201940
10 201638
11 201232
12 201328
13 201227
14 201225
15 202224
16 201421
17 201218
18 202018
19 199415
20 202112

About Luca Angius

Luca Angius is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Neurology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 36 papers that have together received 983 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (14 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (13 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (9 papers), Sports Performance and Training (9 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers) and Sports injuries and prevention (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (518 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (150 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (95 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (208 citations) and Rehabilitation (65 citations). Luca Angius has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Samuele Marcora, James Hopker, Alexis R. Mauger, Emiliano Santarnecchi, Álvaro Pascual‐Leone, Benjamin Pageaux, Antonio Crisafulli, Alberto Concu, Filippo Tocco and Raffaele Milia. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physiology, European Journal of Applied Physiology, European Journal of Pediatrics, Neuroscience and Frontiers in Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact