Lu Chai

2.5k citations
161 papers · 2.0k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Lu Chai

155 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Lu Chai
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.4k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.5k
  • Biophysics 50
  • Biomedical Engineering 371
  • Spectroscopy 133
Replace Chingyue Wang with:
Chingyue Wang China
Vladimir Pervak Germany
K. M. Groom United Kingdom
V. Magni Italy
K. Streubel Germany
A. Villeneuve Canada
Michael R. E. Lamont United States
Inka Manek‐Hönninger France
A.G. Dentai United States
Yuechen Jia China
Lu Chai relative to Chingyue Wang China Chingyue Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Chingyue Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lu Chai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lu Chai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lu Chai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lu Chai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lu Chai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lu Chai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lu Chai. The network helps show where Lu Chai may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lu Chai, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lu Chai Line = papers co-authored together Lu Chai links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 161 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018119
2 200897
3 201257
4 200654
5 201550
6 200649
7 201746
8 200944
9 201140
10 200540
11 200838
12 200438
13 201837
14 200535
15 201333
16 201333
17 199933
18 200832
19 200632
20 201931

About Lu Chai

Lu Chai is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Spectroscopy and Computational Mechanics, having authored 161 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (109 papers), Photonic Crystal and Fiber Optics (78 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (64 papers), Terahertz technology and applications (25 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (20 papers), Optical Network Technologies (18 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (16 papers) and Photonic and Optical Devices (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.4k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.5k citations), Biophysics (50 citations), Biomedical Engineering (371 citations) and Spectroscopy (133 citations). Lu Chai has collaborated with scholars based in China, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Minglie Hu, Chingyue Wang, Youjian Song, Yanfeng Li, А. М. Желтиков, Qirong Xing, Bowen Liu, Xiaohui Fang, Ruoyu Liao and Qingyue Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Chinese Optics Letters, Optics Letters, Optics Communications and Optics & Laser Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact