Louis W. Ehrlich

986 citations
31 papers · 673 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Louis W. Ehrlich

30 papers receiving 582 citations

Peers

Louis W. Ehrlich
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Numerical Analysis 233
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 244
  • Computational Mechanics 249
  • Modeling and Simulation 31
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 31
Replace Christian Wieners with:
Christian Wieners Germany
J. Tinsley Oden United States
Mazen Saad France
Lisheng Hou United States
Murli M. Gupta United States
Francisco J. Gaspar Spain
Xiaoning Zheng United States
Daniele Lamponi Switzerland
J.-P. Zolésio France
Nikolai D. Botkin Germany
Louis W. Ehrlich relative to Christian Wieners Germany Christian Wieners's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Christian Wieners · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Louis W. Ehrlich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Louis W. Ehrlich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louis W. Ehrlich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louis W. Ehrlich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Louis W. Ehrlich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louis W. Ehrlich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louis W. Ehrlich. The network helps show where Louis W. Ehrlich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Louis W. Ehrlich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Louis W. Ehrlich Line = papers co-authored together Louis W. Ehrlich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1967147
2 197576
3 197170
4 197549
5 198539
6 195831
7 198129
8 198428
9 197525
10 197624
11 197219
12 196418
13 197316
14 197713
15 197413
16 197711
17 197411
18 197010
19 19617
20 19856

About Louis W. Ehrlich

Louis W. Ehrlich is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Numerical Analysis, Computational Mechanics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Applied Mathematics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 673 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (9 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (8 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (7 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (5 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (4 papers), Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (4 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (4 papers) and Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (233 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (244 citations), Computational Mechanics (249 citations), Modeling and Simulation (31 citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (31 citations). Louis W. Ehrlich has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Morton H. Friedman, Murli M. Gupta, Vivian O’Brien, James D. Riley, W. Gilbert Strang and B. A. Troesch. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, Journal of Biomechanics, Computers & Fluids, Journal of the ACM and Mathematics of Computation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact