Loe Feijs

4.0k citations
173 papers · 2.3k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Loe Feijs

168 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Loe Feijs
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Human-Computer Interaction 351
  • Applied Psychology 103
  • Software 74
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 337
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 219
Replace Dan Jackson with:
Dan Jackson United Kingdom
Asim Smailagic United States
Manolis Tsiknakis Greece
Yan Ge China
Christine Lisetti United States
Mannes Poel Netherlands
Jani Mäntyjärvi Finland
Jesse Hoey Canada
Filippo Cavallo Italy
Dan Zhang China
Loe Feijs relative to Dan Jackson United Kingdom Dan Jackson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Dan Jackson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Loe Feijs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Loe Feijs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Loe Feijs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Loe Feijs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Loe Feijs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Loe Feijs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Loe Feijs. The network helps show where Loe Feijs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Loe Feijs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Loe Feijs Line = papers co-authored together Loe Feijs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 173 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018113
2 200986
3 199881
4 201871
5 201966
6 201056
7 199856
8 201645
9 201745
10 201243
11 201541
12 201840
13 202140
14 201539
15
Activity recognition based on inertial sensors for Ambient Assisted Living
201638
16 201737
17 200935
18 201130
19 201830
20 201229

About Loe Feijs

Loe Feijs is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 173 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (25 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (15 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (12 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (12 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (11 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (11 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (9 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (351 citations), Applied Psychology (103 citations), Software (74 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (337 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (219 citations). Loe Feijs has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jun Hu, Sidarto Bambang Oetomo, Bin Yu, Mathias Funk, Peter Andriessen, Rohan Joshi, Carola van Pul, Wei Chen, R.L. Krikhaar and Deedee Kommers. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Access, Science of Computer Programming, Acta Paediatrica, Leonardo and Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact