Liting Jing

35 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers

Liting Jing
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 148
  • Management Science and Operations Research 133
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 68
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 36
  • Social Psychology 73
Replace Ming‐Shi Chen with:
Ming‐Shi Chen Taiwan
Yoon-Eui Nahm Japan
Ming‐Chyuan Lin Taiwan
Andrew Olewnik United States
Zhongkai Li China
John Terninko United States
Joseph Donndelinger United States
Nanxin Wang United States
Filippo A. Salustri Canada
S. Sivaloganathan United Kingdom
Liting Jing relative to Ming‐Shi Chen Taiwan Ming‐Shi Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.3×
Ming‐Shi Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liting Jing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liting Jing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liting Jing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liting Jing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liting Jing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liting Jing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liting Jing. The network helps show where Liting Jing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liting Jing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liting Jing Line = papers co-authored together Liting Jing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202139
2 202429
3 202324
4 202322
5 202122
6 201821
7 202021
8 201920
9 202420
10 202120
11 202120
12 202317
13 202416
14 201816
15 202214
16 202214
17 202310
18 20209
19 20238
20 20188

About Liting Jing

Liting Jing is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research, Mechanical Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Social Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multi-Criteria Decision Making (16 papers), Quality Function Deployment in Product Design (16 papers), Design Education and Practice (8 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (8 papers), Product Development and Customization (5 papers), Color perception and design (4 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (4 papers) and Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (148 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (133 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (68 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (36 citations) and Social Psychology (73 citations). Liting Jing has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Shaofei Jiang, Jiquan Li, Xiang Peng, Junfeng Ma, Jing Xie, Fei Gao, Jingwei Yang, Qizhi Li, Xiaoyun Fu and Tingting Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Advanced Engineering Informatics, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Expert Systems with Applications, Journal of Cleaner Production and Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact