Lisa E. Esserman

565 citations
22 papers · 404 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Lisa E. Esserman

22 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

Lisa E. Esserman
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 230
  • Dermatology 113
  • Cancer Research 121
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 45
  • Oncology 44
Replace David E. March with:
David E. March United States
Christina Vallejo United States
B. Dall United Kingdom
Juliana Alves de Souza Brazil
Gloria J Carter United States
Zoltán Péntek Hungary
Christoph Tausch Austria
Tsai-Wang Chang Taiwan
Ruth E. Snyder United States
Lisa E. Esserman relative to David E. March United States David E. March's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
David E. March · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa E. Esserman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa E. Esserman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa E. Esserman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa E. Esserman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa E. Esserman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa E. Esserman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa E. Esserman. The network helps show where Lisa E. Esserman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Lisa E. Esserman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisa E. Esserman Line = papers co-authored together Lisa E. Esserman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004102
2 200781
3 200757
4 200344
5 201522
6 200215
7 200614
8 200113
9 197610
10 20019
11 20028
12 20176
13 20045
14 20004
15 20043
16 20063
17 20053
18 19791
19 20021
20 20051

About Lisa E. Esserman

Lisa E. Esserman is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research, Dermatology, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (9 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (8 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (7 papers), AI in cancer detection (4 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (2 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (2 papers) and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (230 citations), Dermatology (113 citations), Cancer Research (121 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (45 citations) and Oncology (44 citations). Lisa E. Esserman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Robert Poppiti, Marco Cura, Michael J. Plaza, Eva C. Gombos, D.I. Hamasaki, Elkan F. Halpern, Steven W. Rust, Kevin S. Hughes, Hadi Yaziji and James Michaelson. Their work appears in journals such as The Breast Journal, American Journal of Roentgenology, Radiographics, Breast Disease and Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact