Ling-Da Kong

1.3k citations
76 papers · 935 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Ling-Da Kong

68 papers receiving 780 citations

Peers

Ling-Da Kong
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 888
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 320
  • Geophysics 144
  • Biomedical Engineering 129
  • Instrumentation 7
Replace Jakob van den Eijnden with:
Jakob van den Eijnden United Kingdom
Vladislav Loktev Finland
Michal Bursa Czechia
Qian-Qing Yin China
Shumei Jia China
Federico M. Vincentelli United Kingdom
Guglielmo Mastroserio United States
Chin‐Ping Hu Taiwan
Romana Mikusincova Italy
F. Bernardini Italy
Ling-Da Kong relative to Jakob van den Eijnden United Kingdom Jakob van den Eijnden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jakob van den Eijnden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ling-Da Kong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ling-Da Kong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ling-Da Kong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ling-Da Kong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ling-Da Kong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ling-Da Kong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ling-Da Kong. The network helps show where Ling-Da Kong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ling-Da Kong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ling-Da Kong Line = papers co-authored together Ling-Da Kong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020111
2 202258
3 202243
4 202241
5 202435
6 202131
7 201829
8 202025
9 202224
10 202123
11 202023
12 202022
13 202321
14 202018
15 202117
16 202217
17 201916
18 202215
19 202215
20 202115

About Ling-Da Kong

Ling-Da Kong is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Geophysics, Computational Mechanics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 76 papers that have together received 935 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (70 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (55 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (27 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (26 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (9 papers), Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (4 papers), Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies (4 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (888 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (320 citations), Geophysics (144 citations), Biomedical Engineering (129 citations) and Instrumentation (7 citations). Ling-Da Kong has collaborated with scholars based in China, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Long Ji, Shuang-Nan Zhang, Jin‐Lu Qu, Yupeng Chen, Peng-Ju Wang, Zhi Chang, Lian Tao, Qing-Cang Shui, Jing-Qiang Peng and Mingyu Ge. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Astrophysical Journal Letters and Journal of High Energy Astrophysics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact