Lin Foo

585 citations
13 papers · 436 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Lin Foo

11 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers

Lin Foo
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 282
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 192
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 30
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 37
  • Reproductive Medicine 11
Replace Nina Markovic with:
Nina Markovic Serbia
Cristiano Jodicke United States
Antonio Gonzalez‐Ruiz United States
Ichiro Yasuhi Japan
Nathan N Drever United States
Henri Augusto Korkes Brazil
Lem’i İbrahimoğlu Türkiye
Bilge Çetinkaya Demir Türkiye
K. T. M. Schneider Germany
Laurence Skillern United Kingdom
Lin Foo relative to Nina Markovic Serbia Nina Markovic's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Nina Markovic · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lin Foo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lin Foo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lin Foo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lin Foo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lin Foo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lin Foo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lin Foo. The network helps show where Lin Foo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lin Foo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lin Foo Line = papers co-authored together Lin Foo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2015178
2 2018114
3 201345
4 201538
5 201728
6 202012
7 201110
8 20176
9 20242
10 20161
11 20221
12 20161
13 20250

About Lin Foo

Lin Foo is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Health Informatics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (3 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (3 papers), Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (2 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (1 paper), Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (1 paper), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (1 paper) and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (282 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (192 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (30 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (37 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (11 citations). Lin Foo has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malaysia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Carmel M. McEniery, Christoph C. Lees, Ian B. Wilkinson, Phillip R. Bennett, Christopher S. Mathews, David J. Williams, Sara L. Hillman, Melissa Smart, Susan Bewley and Vardhman K. Rakyan. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, Human Molecular Genetics, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact