Limor Peer

28 papers receiving 529 citations

Peers

Limor Peer
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Communication 347
  • Information Systems and Management 57
  • Sociology and Political Science 273
  • Literature and Literary Theory 57
  • Gender Studies 30
Replace Michael Koliska with:
Michael Koliska United States
Raul Ferrer Conill Sweden
Merja Mahrt Germany
Antino Kim United States
Kristin Van Damme Belgium
Jorge Vázquez-Herrero Spain
Pelle Snickars Sweden
Dmitry Epstein United States
Christer Clerwall Sweden
Phillip Brooker United Kingdom
Limor Peer relative to Michael Koliska United States Michael Koliska's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Michael Koliska · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Limor Peer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Limor Peer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Limor Peer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Limor Peer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Limor Peer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Limor Peer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Limor Peer. The network helps show where Limor Peer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Limor Peer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Limor Peer Line = papers co-authored together Limor Peer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014240
2 201178
3 201057
4 201449
5 201426
6 201217
7 199817
8 199617
9 201515
10 199510
11 19928
12
The local TV news experience: How to win viewers by focusing on engagement
20076
13 20226
14 20165
15 20224
16 20044
17 20204
18
If it catches my eye: an exploration of online news experiences of teenagers
20084
19 19903
20 19883

About Limor Peer

Limor Peer is a scholar working on Communication, Information Systems and Management, Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 590 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Research Data Management Practices (9 papers), Media Studies and Communication (8 papers), Social Media and Politics (7 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (6 papers), Media Influence and Politics (5 papers), Data Quality and Management (4 papers), Process Optimization and Integration (3 papers) and Advanced Control Systems Optimization (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (347 citations), Information Systems and Management (57 citations), Sociology and Political Science (273 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (57 citations) and Gender Studies (30 citations). Limor Peer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Thomas B. Ksiazek, Pablo Javier Boczkowski, James S. Ettema, Elizabeth A. Stephenson, Elizabeth Levy Paluck, Lynn Vavreck, DONALD PHILIP GREEN, Robin Gomila, Paul Lagunes and Edward Carl Malthouse. Their work appears in journals such as Data Intelligence, Journalism Studies, Digital Journalism, International Journal of Public Opinion Research and Journal of Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact