Li‐Ling Hope Pan

668 citations
34 papers · 381 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Li‐Ling Hope Pan

30 papers receiving 378 citations

Peers

Li‐Ling Hope Pan
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 166
  • Neurology 49
  • Rehabilitation 36
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 91
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 53
Replace Emily C. Stanyer with:
Emily C. Stanyer United Kingdom
Miklós Lukács Hungary
Nicoletta Brunelli Italy
Bogdan Ignat Romania
Rosanna Palmeri Italy
Maartje L. Schillings Netherlands
Magdalena Mirkowski Canada
Peter Storch Germany
Meghan A. Linsdell Canada
Tammy L. Lisi United States
Li‐Ling Hope Pan relative to Emily C. Stanyer United Kingdom Emily C. Stanyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Emily C. Stanyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Li‐Ling Hope Pan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Li‐Ling Hope Pan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li‐Ling Hope Pan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li‐Ling Hope Pan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Li‐Ling Hope Pan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li‐Ling Hope Pan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li‐Ling Hope Pan. The network helps show where Li‐Ling Hope Pan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Li‐Ling Hope Pan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Li‐Ling Hope Pan Line = papers co-authored together Li‐Ling Hope Pan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201860
2 202350
3 201639
4 202028
5 202220
6 202119
7 202218
8 201917
9 202217
10 202014
11 202213
12 202212
13 202310
14 20239
15 20218
16 20247
17 20237
18 20215
19 20214
20 20154

About Li‐Ling Hope Pan

Li‐Ling Hope Pan is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology and Sensory Systems, having authored 34 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (18 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (3 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (2 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (166 citations), Neurology (49 citations), Rehabilitation (36 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (91 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (53 citations). Li‐Ling Hope Pan has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Shuu‐Jiun Wang, Shih‐Pin Chen, Wei‐Ta Chen, Kuan‐Lin Lai, Li‐Wei Chou, Fu‐Jung Hsiao, Yen-Feng Wang, Shun-Hwa Wei, Mei‐Wun Tsai and Yen‐Feng Wang. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Headache and Pain, Cephalalgia, Pain, Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain and Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact