Licai Yang

64 papers receiving 748 citations

Peers

Licai Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 204
  • Transportation 73
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 106
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 152
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 22
Replace Ying Lee with:
Ying Lee United States
Lin Zhu China
Hao Tang China
Zhilu Chen China
Zhen Liu China
Clement Chun Cheong Pang Hong Kong
Weidong Fang China
Sebastian Lange Germany
Zhihao Zhang China
Licai Yang relative to Ying Lee United States Ying Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ying Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Licai Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Licai Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Licai Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Licai Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Licai Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Licai Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Licai Yang. The network helps show where Licai Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Licai Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Licai Yang Line = papers co-authored together Licai Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201497
2 201764
3 202250
4 201733
5 201730
6 201828
7 202228
8 201926
9 201425
10 201123
11 201921
12 202020
13 201517
14 201716
15 202016
16 200816
17 202015
18 202014
19 200914
20 202212

About Licai Yang

Licai Yang is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Building and Construction, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience and Transportation, having authored 65 papers that have together received 775 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques (14 papers), Traffic control and management (13 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (13 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (10 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (10 papers), Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) (8 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (5 papers) and Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (204 citations), Transportation (73 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (106 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (152 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (22 citations). Licai Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lulu Zhao, Chengyu Liu, Hongyu Shi, Zhonghua Su, Dandan Yan, Haiqing Liu, Yunfeng Shi, Ruimin Wang, Fang Yang and Quanguang Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as IET Intelligent Transport Systems, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, Frontiers in Physiology and Molecular BioSystems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact