Libo Feng

480 citations
38 papers · 297 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Libo Feng

33 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Libo Feng
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Information Systems 181
  • Computer Networks and Communications 104
  • Management Information Systems 23
  • Health Informatics 3
  • Artificial Intelligence 69
Replace Shouki A. Ebad with:
Shouki A. Ebad Saudi Arabia
S. Alonso Monsalve Spain
Lisa Childers United States
Ali Ahmed Egypt
Damiano Torre Canada
Bjørnar Solhaug Norway
Kazi Sakib Bangladesh
Nurulhuda Firdaus Mohd Azmi Malaysia
Marwa Salah Farhan Egypt
Erik Wittern United States
Libo Feng relative to Shouki A. Ebad Saudi Arabia Shouki A. Ebad's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Shouki A. Ebad · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Libo Feng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Libo Feng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Libo Feng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Libo Feng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Libo Feng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Libo Feng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Libo Feng. The network helps show where Libo Feng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Libo Feng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Libo Feng Line = papers co-authored together Libo Feng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201854
2 201745
3 201731
4 201828
5 201819
6 201418
7 202116
8 20249
9 20248
10 20248
11 20156
12 20215
13 20225
14
Questioning the staging of tumor deposits of colorectal cancer in the eighth edition of the TNM classification: validation by prognosis.
20195
15 20194
16 20233
17 20253
18
[Safety evaluation of intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy with Lobaplatin for advanced colorectal cancers].
20153
19 20243
20 20173

About Libo Feng

Libo Feng is a scholar working on Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Surgery and Neurology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (18 papers), Cryptography and Data Security (6 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (4 papers), Brain Tumor Detection and Classification (4 papers), Cloud Data Security Solutions (4 papers), IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (3 papers), Distributed systems and fault tolerance (3 papers) and Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems (181 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (104 citations), Management Information Systems (23 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (69 citations). Libo Feng has collaborated with scholars based in China, Singapore and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hui Zhang, Yong Chen, Wei‐Tek Tsai, Xin Wang, Hui Zhang, Chan Lyu, Hui Zhang, Shaowen Yao, Jinli Wang and Yong Fan. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Internet of Things Journal, Future Generation Computer Systems, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, Applied Sciences and Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact