Li‐Bing Jiang

443 citations
8 papers · 384 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
    • Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
    • Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
    • Catalytic Alkyne Reactions
    • Synthesis and Biological Evaluation
    • Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques
    • Chemical Synthesis and Reactions

Papers in

    • Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions 7
    • Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods 6
    • Chemical Synthesis and Reactions 2
    • Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 1
    • Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 1
    • Catalytic Alkyne Reactions 1
    • Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis 3

Li‐Bing Jiang

8 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

Li‐Bing Jiang
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 132
  • Organic Chemistry 360
  • Inorganic Chemistry 82
  • Pharmaceutical Science 17
  • Pharmacology 15
Replace C. Chun Chen with:
C. Chun Chen United Kingdom
Vera Hirschbeck Germany
Can Zhao China
C. R. Sinu India
Lizhu Gao China
Cole C. Meyer United States
Youbin Peng China
Linhong Zuo China
Tian‐Qi Wei China
Y. Six France
Li‐Bing Jiang relative to C. Chun Chen United Kingdom C. Chun Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
C. Chun Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Li‐Bing Jiang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Li‐Bing Jiang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li‐Bing Jiang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li‐Bing Jiang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Li‐Bing Jiang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li‐Bing Jiang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li‐Bing Jiang. The network helps show where Li‐Bing Jiang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Li‐Bing Jiang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Li‐Bing Jiang Line = papers co-authored together Li‐Bing Jiang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 201591
2 201680
3 201573
4 201564
5 201635
6 201724
7 201612
8 20175

About Li‐Bing Jiang

Li‐Bing Jiang is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Process Chemistry and Technology, Inorganic Chemistry, Infectious Diseases and Surgery, having authored 8 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (7 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (6 papers), Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (2 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (1 paper), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (1 paper), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (1 paper) and Catalytic Alkyne Reactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (132 citations), Organic Chemistry (360 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (82 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (17 citations) and Pharmacology (15 citations). Li‐Bing Jiang has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and China. Frequent co-authors include Xiao‐Feng Wu, Xinxin Qi, Haopeng Li, Chong‐Liang Li, Xinxin Qi, Rui Li, Rui Li, Chao Zhou, Jin‐Bao Peng and Rui Li. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, ChemCatChem, Molecular Catalysis, ChemistryOpen and Catalysis Science & Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact