Liat Maoz

871 citations
4 papers · 389 · h-index 3

Impact in

    • Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
    • Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
    • Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
    • Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
    • Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
    • Advanced Differential Geometry Research

Papers in

Liat Maoz

4 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

Liat Maoz
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 364
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 314
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 197
  • Computational Mathematics 3
  • Geometry and Topology 19
Replace Darya Krym with:
Darya Krym United States
Martín Schvellinger Argentina
Bindusar Sahoo India
Giorgio Immirzi Italy
Michael Koehn Germany
Max Riegler Austria
Neil R. Constable United States
Hyeong-Chan Kim South Korea
Daniel Kapec United States
Richard Corrado United States
Liat Maoz relative to Darya Krym United States Darya Krym's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Darya Krym · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liat Maoz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liat Maoz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liat Maoz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liat Maoz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liat Maoz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liat Maoz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liat Maoz. The network helps show where Liat Maoz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Liat Maoz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liat Maoz Line = papers co-authored together Liat Maoz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

4 of 4 papers shown
#Work
1 2004266
2 2000104
3 200318
4
Some aspects of the AdS/CFT correspondence. Proc. of the 73rd Meeting between physicists and mathematicians
20051

About Liat Maoz

Liat Maoz is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 4 papers that have together received 389 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (3 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (3 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (2 papers) and Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (364 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (314 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (197 citations), Computational Mathematics (3 citations) and Geometry and Topology (19 citations). Liat Maoz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Juan Maldacena, Marc Henneaux, A. Schwimmer, Asad Naqvi and J. de Boer. Their work appears in journals such as Comptes Rendus Physique, Journal of High Energy Physics, Annals of Physics and UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact