Li Lim

1.5k citations
38 papers · 1.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Li Lim

37 papers receiving 1k citations

Peers

Li Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 756
  • Ophthalmology 150
  • Endocrinology 25
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 202
  • Pharmaceutical Science 30
Replace Carlos Rocha‐de‐Lossada with:
Carlos Rocha‐de‐Lossada Spain
Nikhil Sharad Gokhale India
Parag A. Majmudar United States
Cheryl MacGregor United Kingdom
Danial Roshandel Iran
Emily Suhan Wong Hong Kong
Shane R. Durkin Australia
Sylvia L Hargrave United States
Hasenin Al-khersan United States
Lênio Souza Alvarenga Brazil
Li Lim relative to Carlos Rocha‐de‐Lossada Spain Carlos Rocha‐de‐Lossada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.6×
Carlos Rocha‐de‐Lossada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Li Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Li Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Li Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li Lim. The network helps show where Li Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Li Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Li Lim Line = papers co-authored together Li Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000150
2 200668
3
Therapeutic use of Bausch & Lomb PureVision contact lenses.
200167
4 201562
5 201860
6 200759
7 199956
8 202055
9 200053
10 200644
11 201839
12 202038
13 201136
14 200030
15 200330
16 201730
17 200429
18 200629
19 201125
20 200321

About Li Lim

Li Lim is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology and Endocrinology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (22 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (9 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (5 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (1 paper), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (1 paper) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (756 citations), Ophthalmology (150 citations), Endocrinology (25 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (202 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (30 citations). Li Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Donald T.H. Tan, Rui Hua Wei, Douglas John Coster, Konrad Pesudovs, Cordelia Chan, Wing-Kwong Chan, Aliza Jap, Daniel Kai Peng Chua, Rajesh K. Rajpal and Béatrice Cochener. Their work appears in journals such as Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice, Ophthalmology, Journal of Refractive Surgery, Cornea and British Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact