Lev Kaplan

2.0k citations
69 papers · 1.4k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Lev Kaplan

61 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Lev Kaplan
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 891
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 60
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 908
  • Condensed Matter Physics 110
  • Mathematical Physics 59
Replace Natalia G. Berloff with:
Natalia G. Berloff United Kingdom
Antonio Picozzi France
S. Bielawski France
Stephen C. Creagh United Kingdom
Francesco Cataliotti Italy
Mohsen Razavy Canada
Axel Pelster Germany
Vittorio Penna Italy
A. M. Kamchatnov Russia
Christine Guerlin France
Lev Kaplan relative to Natalia G. Berloff United Kingdom Natalia G. Berloff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Natalia G. Berloff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lev Kaplan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lev Kaplan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lev Kaplan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lev Kaplan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lev Kaplan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lev Kaplan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lev Kaplan. The network helps show where Lev Kaplan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lev Kaplan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lev Kaplan Line = papers co-authored together Lev Kaplan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010180
2 1998129
3 199981
4 200967
5 200966
6 199755
7 199951
8 200250
9 200848
10 199845
11 200039
12 200734
13 201634
14 201034
15 199831
16 200930
17 201730
18 200028
19 200126
20 201325

About Lev Kaplan

Lev Kaplan is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Condensed Matter Physics and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (33 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (13 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (13 papers), Scientific Research and Discoveries (11 papers), Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing (8 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (8 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (7 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (891 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (60 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (908 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (110 citations) and Mathematical Physics (59 citations). Lev Kaplan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Eric J. Heller, G. L. Celardo, T. Papenbrock, H.‐J. Stöckmann, Ulrich Kuhl, R. Höhmann, A. Matthew Smith, Dmitry B. Uskov, Neepa T. Maitra and S. A. Fulling. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review A, Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B, Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical and Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact